Click here to go back to the website

Archive for February, 2010

It’s sad – but Spanish realism now can avoid a huge loss later

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

It’s sad – but Spanish realism now can avoid a huge loss later

I am all too often instructed these days by British Nationals whose investment in a holiday home in Spain has turned sour.

The typical scenarios usually have all or a combination of these factors

• The end of a fixed mortgage term - when a replacement loan is either unavailable or far more expensive

• The loss of employment, which means that a foreign second home is now a luxury that cannot be afforded

• The onset of ill health means that regular air travel is now impossible

• The fall in value of the Spanish property (and fear that the value may soon fall further) means that the second home is now a source of huge worry and no longer a pleasure

There have of course been recessions and credit crunches before and history does seem to show that a property owner who can afford to hold his nerve and wait, will eventually find values rising again. But this is of no comfort to an owner who cannot afford to pay increasing mortgage payments. Simply sitting it out should be no more an option than sticking one’s head in the sand but sitting it out and worrying (and doing nothing) is exactly the worst thing to do and also it’s what most people do.

If the above describes the problem you are facing – what action should you take? The obvious choice is to sell the place. This is easier said than done in the present market – the risk is that high fees might be incurred on estate agency and marketing costs, for no result.

In Spain, there may be another option – one which does not exist in UK to the same extent. In UK, mortgage borrowers in distress can be very unhappy to learn that they cannot expect simply to return the keys to the Bank and then be able to walk away from the debt. In Spain however, this might be possible and increasingly often I am notarising Spanish Deeds to do exactly that.

The detailed information below is provided by a lawyer practicing in Spain - Mr Raymundo Larrian Nesbitt. You can find out more about him and read his own article if you follow the link I have placed in the “Links” section of my main website.

There is provision for this procedure enshrined in the Spanish Civil Code

Article 1175 of the Spanish Civil Code says

Payment by assignment of Property

The debtor may assign his property to creditors in payment of his debts. This assignment liberates the former from liability to the net amount of the property assigned unless there are stipulations to the contrary. Agreements in respect to the effects of an assignment, entered into between the debtor and his creditors shall be made in accordance with …………………..the Code of Civil Procedure

The Spanish phrase for this procedure is “Dación en Pago”.

The difference from English law is that once the dacion en pago has taken place then the debt is wiped. The Bank now owns the property. If the Bank cannot sell it or it makes a huge loss, there is no comeback to the original mortgage borrower. Contrast that with UK where, even after a Bank may have accepted the keys and taken over the property, still the mortgage debt is continuing to rise until the property is eventually sold, perhaps many months or even years later. In Spain the opposite is the case – the slate is wiped completely clean and the former owner/borrower can consign the whole affair to history. He can “move on” as our Government likes to say!

Although this is a procedure where it is not absolutely required that you instruct a lawyer to act for you, my advice is that you certainly should NOT deal with a dacion en pago by merely sorting it out with your Bank direct.

In this procedure as with all financial matters, it is well worth having professional advice. There are rules to be adhered to, and there is the possibility of negotiation. Who will pay for the valuation fees, the Registry costs. Perhaps if the property is well out of negative equity you can negotiate that money is payable back to you at the time of an eventual sale. You need proper advice- especially at what can be a very stressful and indeed emotional time.

However you cannot leave it until matters have gone too far. First – the Property must not be in negative equity prior to the negotiations beginning and Second – the Bank must not have already started legal proceedings against you for repossession of the property.

These two rules taken together underline the importance of acting in time. If you can see now that you are heading for trouble because your Spanish mortgage is simply too expensive, do take legal advice NOW. Sad as it is to cut your losses and to acknowledge to yourself that the Spanish dream is over, early recognition of the reality of the situation can result in being able to hand back the house, hand back the debt, hand back the worry and the sleepless nights and walk away free. The alternative might be to cling on to an increasingly worthless property which you never visit and which is eventually repossessed anyway: leaving you still responsible for an ever increasing debt you cannot afford, a debt which the foreign Bank can in due course attach to your assets in UK or anywhere in the world.

For Spanish property owners in financial difficulty the dacion en pago might just turn out to be a lifeline. And lifelines should be seized whilst there is still time.

More on the Companies Act s 44

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

New Tins – New Worms (Authorised Signatories not authorised to sign)

I can make no apology for returning to the question which more than any other seems to cause problems and frustrations for UK companies in dealing with jurisdictions abroad.

It has been noted before, by both lawyers and Company Officers, that we do not seem to be on each other’s wavelengths! I fully understand that there can often be a conflict between the business man in a hurry and the lawyer advising that progress be made only cautiously with strict regard to the wording of the law. We lawyers are not trying to slow things down even though it may seem that we are.

I have previously set out section 44 of the Companies Act with regard to the requirements of valid Deed – and noted that a Company can only appoint an Attorney, by a valid Deed.

I have also blogged about the new s47 of the Act which enables a Company by Deed, to appoint an Attorney whose authority can include the Power to execute future Powers of Attorney by Deed all on his/her own (plus a signing Witness), even though that Attorney may not be a Director or Company Secretary or even an employee of the Company at all.

Still with me? Now for section 44 (3) which in typical fashion attempts to clarify the law and succeeds more often than not in confusing everyone
S44 (3) states that “The following are “authorised signatories” for the purposes of subsection (2)—
“(a) every director of the company, and
“(b) in the case of a private company with a secretary or a public company, the secretary (or any joint secretary) of the company. “

Where is the confusion? This means that the Company Secretary is authorised to sign Deeds and Documents on behalf of the Company, right? Well it would mean that, if the weasel words “for the purposes of subsection (2)” are overlooked. In every other Country in the World the expression “Authorised Signatory” is used and understood by lawyers and business people alike, to have its dictionary meaning. If I am your Authorised Signatory then my signature stands for yours doesn’t it? Perhaps it does, unless we are dealing with an English and Welsh Limited Company!

Because the proviso “for the purposes of subsection (2)” means that section 3 is merely a definition section to interpret s44 (2) which itself states
A document is validly executed by a company if it is signed on behalf of the company—
(a) by two authorised signatories, or
(b) by a director of the company in the presence of a witness who attests the signature.

So you might be an Authorised Signatory, but you cannot validly execute a Company document on your own if you are not a Director!

Do you find room in your heart to pity the poor Notary, who has to explain to the stressed out Company Secretary (who has perhaps been left to run the Company on his own in the factory with all the Directors abroad and who needs to get a Power of Attorney ready for use in Russia TODAY) that just because he is an Authorised Signatory of the Company, he certainly should not be under the impression that he is authorised to sign anything for the Company?