Click here to go back to the website

Archive for the ‘Notarisation within England and Wales’ Category

British Birth, Death or Marriage Certificates may not be Copied

Thursday, August 12th, 2010

British Birth Death and Marriage Certificates – No-one may copy them

As an English Notary, I am very often asked to assist people in England who need to produce documentation for use in foreign jurisdictions.

Of course, the requirements of foreign jurisdictions are many and various and so it should not be too much of a surprise to find that occasionally there are contradictions between what is needed abroad – on the one hand – and what is permitted in England - on the other.

One example of this arises when I am asked to produce notarially certificated COPIES of UK documents. These are often needed in order to obtain a visa for work or settlement in a foreign country. In particular in the United Arab Emirates and in Canada (and no doubt in several other countries) the requirement often includes a request for COPIES of birth certificates or of marriage certificates to be produced.

In respect of clients needing to resolve matters after a relative’s death abroad – perhaps wanting to obtain the release of money in a foreign Bank – the requirement often is for a COPY of a death certificate to be notarised and then Apostilled.

However, the rules of Crown Copyright require that no-one may place an official birth death or marriage certificate on a photocopier and press the button. If they do, a Notary Public is certainly not allowed to add a certificate to it.

The actual rule is to be found at

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/advice/crown-copyright/copyright-guidance/copying-of-birth-death-and-marriage-certificates-and-marriage-registers.htm

and its consequence is that a Notary can only certify an “Original” certificate.

Many of the clients I see have the actual birth certificate which their parents were given at the time of the birth – or the marriage certificate handed to them at their wedding. Although these certificates can only be documents onto which the fact of the birth or marriage registration are copied – so that they themselves are “Certified Copies”, nevertheless I often find that my client considers that these are “original” certificates which have significant sentimental value.

The answer is that new certificates can be purchased direct from the Registry office at any time. If you require a certificate to be Notarised, it is quicker if you contact me and I will purchase the new Certificate/s in readiness for our meeting. The advantage of this that, because I receive it direct from the Government office, I will know that is genuine without need of any further checks and so I can certify it straightaway. Otherwise if my client brings me the certificate, I can only certify it to be genuine after phoning or writing to the Registry for verification.

Time is Running Out - Avoid Company Default

Friday, August 6th, 2010

Companies Act 2006 ss 155 to 159

Since October 2008 it has not been possible to set up a Company in England and Wales unless at least one of the Directors is a living human - a “Natural Person” - and not itself another Company.

Because this was not previously the rule, there has been a run-off period of grace allowed of two years.

This indulgence will expire on 30th September. On or after 1st October 2010, any Company in which all of the Directors are corporate entities will be in default and subject to being fined. Please note that even if the Company Secretary is a natural person, this will not comply with the Law if none of the Directors are natural persons.

If your Company is in this position – Time is running out

Getting the Apostille - Always use a NOTARY

Tuesday, August 3rd, 2010

ALWAYS USE A NOTARY FOR DOCUMENTS TO BE USED ABROAD, IF YOU ARE ASKED FOR THE “APOSTILLE”.

I return to the topic of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office Apostille – it seems to me that this is a part of the Notarial process which is misunderstood more than any other.

Typically a client is told that the document to be signed in England must be returned to the foreign jurisdiction “with the Apostille”. Usually this is the first time that the word has ever been heard by my client – who does not know what its meaning.

Also, it is by no means always the case that the foreign lawyer advising has a full understanding of what is required. In England there is a clear distinction between the lawyers who have jurisdiction here (the Solicitors) and those whose jurisdiction extends overseas (Notaries). In most countries in the world, there is no such distinction. Particularly in Europe, the lawyers who deal with land transactions are all Notaries. They naturally deal, almost all of the time, with transactions and clients who live in their own country and therefore generally speaking most foreign Notaries have little or no experience of dealing with overseas issues. This contrasts entirely with the experience of UK Notaries, whose daily work is almost solely concerned with overseas matters. This means that more often than a foreign Notary is likely to want to admit, they have little or no direct experience of acting for clients who need to execute documents in England.

What they do know, is that they need an Apostille and so this is the instruction that a person in England is given.

A problem that arises is that the client in England who has been told that an Apostille is required once he has signed his paperwork in the presence of a Notary, has never heard the word “Apostille” and has probably never heard the word “Notary” used in England. S/He contacts the foreign Notary to explain that the lawyers in UK are called “Solicitors” and the foreign Notary might say that all that is required is the Apostille anyway. So since neither the client nor the Foreign Notary are aware that Solicitors in England do not have the jurisdiction of Notaries, off the UK resident goes to have the document witnessed and certified by a Solicitor.

At this stage a well informed Solicitor would explain to the client that in fact a Notary is required, but often this does not happen since the Solicitor has no experience of being asked to assist in relation to a foreign transaction and simply does not realise that s/he does not have the necessary authority.

You might think that this catalogue of errors would be brought to a halt when the paperwork is submitted to the Foreign and Commonwealth (FCO) office for the Apostille to be affixed. However, this is not the function of the FCO – it simply adds the Apostille if satisfied that the the relevant signatory is known to it. The FCO will confirm, by affixing an Apostille, that the signatory is a Notary, or is a Solicitor, or is a Judge, or a Doctor, or a University Vice-Chancellor, etc etc, as the case may be. It is not the job of the FCO to read the paperwork and advise the client that because a Dentist, or a Solicitor, has acted as witness therefore the foreign jurisdiction is not being given the authentication it requires. Indeed it is not the job of the Foreign Office to read the paperwork at all.

It therefore happens very often that, say, a Power of Attorney for use in France is executed in England before a Solicitor who is not a Notary and the Apostille is added and the document is returned to France for use. Usually its failure to comply with the internationally agreed conventions is noticed at some late stage causing expensive delay. Sometimes the irregularity is not noticed at all and the transaction is “completed” - the money is paid and the new “owner” moves in. In such a case there may be no end to the legal actions and cost and distress which might arise when the mistake is eventually noted.

Because the paperwork has not been completed correctly may mean in the worst case that title to the property has not passed to the Buyer, As one example, consider the case of a Seller going bankrupt after completing the sale and spending the money. The creditor having inspected the sale paperwork discovers that it was not notarised as required by the law, and will raise claims against the Buyer,(that they are not in fact the owner because the paper title is defective and so they should turn the property over to the creditors), against the Foreign Notary and against the English Solicitor.

The fact of the matter is, that if you are in the position of entering into any documentation for use abroad and which you need to sign in England, then you must protect yourself by having your signatures Notarised. Only a Notary Public can do this in England.

Even though your foreign lawyer may well tell you that the only important thing is the Apostille and that you can obtain this by any means, including having your papers dealt with by a non-Notary Solicitor in England, this is simply not the case.

In these circumstances unless you use a Notary, who is the proper legal Officer for the job (and who carries the necessary insurance to protect you) you place your transaction and your wealth at serious risk

Monday, May 11th, 2009

Civil Procedure Rules in England and Wales

 

Notarial Acts now have recognized Probative Force

 

The 2006 amendments to the Civil Procedure rules include a new rule 32.20 which gives probative force to Notarial Acts. The rule says “A Notarial act or instrument may be received in evidence without further proof as duly authenticated in accordance with the requirements of law unless the contrary is proved”

 

What does it mean?

Well, as with all new law, the Judges will no doubt tell us in due course! What seems to be certain is that the Certificate of an English and Welsh Notary made in England and Wales is now accepted in the Courts as prime facie evidence of the truth of the statement contained in it. 

Two obvious uses to which the new powers can be put immediately are

  • in recording facts for future litigation, particularly where there are elderly or infirm witnesses
  • in the making of Wills (perhaps with recourse to the Testator’s doctor or other relatives) where the Notary is able to record at the making of the Will that the Testator is of full age sound mind fully aware of the extent of his family to whom he may or may not have allegiance and that the Will is made of free will and without undue influence

 

The point is that the Notary is an independent third party lawyer owing a duty of care to the overall “Transaction” and not merely to the party paying him. Our Certificates are intended to be of great assistance to any Judge since to mount a successful challenge to the Certificate would be to impugn the integrity of the Notary himself. The likelihood is that the use of Notarial certificates and acts having true Probative Force will increasingly be of service to the administration of Justice and thereby to the service of the public.

One of my colleagues has emailed me to say

I thought that you would be interested to know that I have prepared a certificate today with the intention that it might be used in court proceedings in this Country.

I was asked to view some pages from a website, print them off, confirm what I had done in a certificate and attach the printed web pages to that certificate. It struck me that this was an ideal introduction to the new world of probative acts. I was preserving evidence of something that is transient. I had only to record what I had done and I did not have to express any opinions whatsoever. My client took the view that the website contained misleading information; but that is a matter for him and the Courts.

Another case might be to prove rights of authorship – send me a CD or MP3 of your music and a statutory declaration can be made – a very cost effective way to prove copyright.

This change in the law is of obvious benefit to any party or solicitor involved in or contemplating litigation. If you fear that one day in the future you may need to prove as fact any matter which I can properly certify today (remember that I am able to certify anything which I can personally verify as a fact – this does not however mean that I can record my mere opinion since, as before, opinions are a matter for your expert witness) then give me a call and I can provide a suitable notarised certificate.

I leave it to your own ingenuity to devise further uses for this new facility – it seems to me that there is huge potential for Notarial assistance in litigation under the new rule.